Skip to content

docs: add the STATE v2 thin journal (docs/status/JOURNAL.adoc) - #96

Merged
hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/rename-everytype-anytime-repos-w4t306
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

hyperpolymath merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/rename-everytype-anytime-repos-w4t306

Conversation

@hyperpolymath

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Adds the v2 thin journal that STATE option B (ruled 2026-11-10) sends the journal sections of STATE v1 to. You said it is just a file in the repo, so this is that file: docs/status/JOURNAL.adoc.

Changes

  • docs/status/JOURNAL.adoc (new). The five STATE v2 fields from standards 1-formats/templates/STATE.a2ml.v2.spec.adoc: phase, last_action, next_action, session_marker, updated, plus a Blockers table. It is AsciiDoc, not the spec's @state block, because A2ML is retired and no new .a2ml may be created.
  • docs/practice/AI-CONVENTIONS.adoc. Session startup step 2 now reads the journal, so agents actually use it. STATE v1 is marked legacy.
  • systemet_chora.deed. Comments only: STATE's [position] phase = "implementation" now has a home (the journal's free-text phase), where the last PR left it as an open owner question. Milestones stay in ROADMAP.adoc.

Where each field came from

STATE v1 is stale (2026-07-29), and this repo has moved a lot since, so the journal is checked against primary sources. The file has a Provenance section saying which is which.

Not carried, because stale

STATE v1 listed two blockers I did not carry: issue 18 (the descriptiles/6a2 migration, "blocked: contractiles.mjs needs Node, estate-denied") and issue 30 (the K9 gate "now real and red"). The migration is done (the ROADMAP records the pure renames), K9 is green on the last merged PR, and Node is not outright banned under the Bun > Deno > pnpm > npm order.

Decision for you

The journal says it governs over STATE v1's journal sections where they disagree, so the two don't double-track while STATE stays live. That is my reading of option B. Say so if you want it worded differently.

RSR Quality Checklist

Required

  • Tests pass — N/A: docs and comments only.
  • Code is formatted — N/A.
  • Linter is clean — deed_lint.js reports OK on the deed.
  • No banned language patterns; no unsafe; no banned functions.
  • SPDX headers present on the new file.
  • No secrets, credentials, or .env files included.

As Applicable

  • .machine_readable/descriptiles/STATE.a2ml updated — not changed (see above).
  • Documentation updated.

Testing

  • deed_lint.js → OK.
  • Every path the journal cites exists, including Wager/VERDICT.adoc and ADR-0002.
  • scripts/check-root-shape.sh and scripts/check-no-md-in-docs.sh → PASS. No .a2ml created.

Generated by Claude Code

STATE option B (ruled 2026-11-10) sends the journal sections of STATE v1 to the
v2 thin journal. The owner said that journal is just a file in the repo, so this
adds it.

Format: the five STATE v2 fields from standards
1-formats/templates/STATE.a2ml.v2.spec.adoc (phase, blockers, last_action,
next_action, session_marker, plus updated), written as AsciiDoc. The spec writes
it as an a2ml @State block, but A2ML is retired and no new .a2ml may be created.

Content is checked against primary sources, not copied from STATE v1, which is
months stale: phase and last_action from the repo's own PROOF-STATUS/ROADMAP and
the latest merge commits; blockers from the obligations ledger and the wager
VERDICT. next_action is carried from STATE v1 and flagged for owner confirmation
in session_marker. Each file has a Provenance section saying which is which.

The file says it governs over STATE v1's journal sections, so the two do not
double-track while STATE.a2ml stays live for the gates that still require it.

Wired: AI-CONVENTIONS session startup now reads the journal, and the deed
comments now say where STATE [position] phase went (the journal's free-text
phase) instead of leaving it as an owner question.

Verified: deed_lint.js OK; every path the journal cites exists; check-root-shape
and check-no-md-in-docs pass; no .a2ml created.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J1XmMC49T8sZ3uUuvrgB7y
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explain Change →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2026 19:36
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ❌ Failed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ❌ Failed 2026-11-10T19:36:06.512727Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
8a5e0cd Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath merged commit 6e5706c into main Nov 10, 2026
30 of 31 checks passed
@hyperpolymath
hyperpolymath deleted the claude/rename-everytype-anytime-repos-w4t306 branch November 10, 2026 19:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants